When sectarian ideas become law, countries lose momentum. Economic, and intellectual leadership in the world depend on progress and a country’s progress slows when religion effects policy too much.
There are examples of this throughout history. Centuries ago the middle east was a leader in the world -- scientifically, artistically and militarily. Two of the sectarian ideas which caused them to lose their momentum, are the idea that it is immoral to collect interest on loans and the idea that women are not entitled to equal rights.
Because Arabs could not collect interest on loans, they were effectively shut out of the banking business. Their religious laws sealed their doom, because we know that money is power and banks are where the money is. The Jews, who had no such laws against collecting interest on loans, became the bankers and the powerful. It wasn’t because Jews were such brilliant financial wizards, or that they were evil or overly conniving. It was because the Arab’s own religious law put them at a total and absurd disadvantage.
Because they gave women no opportunities to become educated the Arabs lost considerably more than half their intellectual pool. If you measure physically, they lost exactly half. But consider the contributions and competition that were lost – intellectual contributions and competition which would have made their male academics better. It’s been well proven that countries where women have equal (or nearly equal) opportunities progress better economically, scientifically and socially.
The Arab leaders truly believed their religion which said collecting interest was immoral and women were not equal. They legislated those beliefs and those were among the main reasons that Europe gradually took over as the world’s leader. If it wasn’t for the value of their oil, the middle east countries likely wouldn’t have yet regained a significant role in the world.
Today we have the some thing trying to happen in the United States, where the leadership role in the world migrated from Europe partly because of religious oppression. We have people beginning to legislate their sectarian views. If they continue to do so, they will slow our progress and hasten our fall from leadership.
One of the most important and exciting areas of scientific study today is stem cell research. Some religious people believe it’s immoral, not too unlike those Arabs who believed collecting interest on loans was immoral. Because President Bush and his republican congress have legislated against stem cell research, many scientists who want to work on this most promising leading edge of science have moved and are moving out of the country. And so our intellectual pool and our leadership in science has begun to ebb.
Some of our religious people label homosexuality immoral and are trying to legislate against equal rights for gays. If their misguided yet relentless efforts to make gays second class citizens should succeed, many gays might be inclined to leave the country. Losing that portion of the intellectual pool would further accelerate our fall from leadership in the world.
I heard about a southern community of farmers who hired a consultant to come and tell them how to get businesses interested in moving into their county. They wanted to diversify their tax base and provide employment, so that fewer of their children would be moving away to find work. They had a meeting where the consultant talked about tax abatements, roads, water and other infrastructure improvements that were necessary to attract businesses. The farmers were nodding their heads and agreeing with him unanimously until he mentioned homosexuality. The consultant explained that because businesses employed a certain amount of gays, they would have to be tolerant and accepting of gays in the community. The meeting ended right there and that farming community made no attempts to lure business. If and when those farmers make our country into their community, business and power will go elsewhere and we’ll become a third rate country.
Ah ye greatly religious folk who wish to have your morals de jour legislated for us all to “enjoy”. You remind me of a line from Leonard Cohen’s song “Suzanne”. How long will it be till we all sink “beneath your wisdom like a stone”?
Search
Archives
- August 2007 (1)
- June 2007 (1)
- May 2007 (4)
- April 2007 (3)
- more...
When sectarian ideas become law
Trackback address for this post:
Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments
UK laws were once all based on sectarian principles. But I have always assumed that the law is a purer democrat than the state over here. The government still has to portray Church of England 'views' (see Tony Blair's post Prime Ministerial step to Catholicism) but the legislators have removed the church's input as an authority for any laws, even divorce laws, as soon as society demanded change. Social trends have always demanded such change, the Civil Partnership Act recently allowed homosexuals to live as if married for instance. And the fact that the very essence of our domestic policy is based around the nuclear family - a Christian ideal - it has still done nothing to hold back the strong steps taken to equalize and empower both women and minorities in the last century.
If America really is slipping down a spiral of sectarian control then Europe is doing the exact opposite - in an attempt to beat out every inequality that might exist as a result of political or religious view. European legislation is a creature which it seems cannot possibly take influence from a despotic minority: its simple constitution is currently far too diverse. Despite this I can in no way foresee the new 'United States of Europe' becoming a born again superpower!
| LouisRobert [Member] 06/03/07 @ 04:40 |
Female equality had nothign to do with the rise of Europe, that was the elightenment which allowed the development of science and technology unrestricted by 'Morality' and tradition. The country that most benefited from the enlightenment was Scotland who moved from a backward Kirk dominated provence to a world leader in philosophy, economics and technology.
Islam was progressive until the 16C and the reconquest of Spain after that it became despotic and reactionary. It is not Islam itself it is the fact that the muslim world have never had an elightenment period and in reaction to Europes rise have gone into their shell. Suffi Islam is relatively liberal however it has bene largly replaced by Wahabism which ws supported by teh US as a way of keeping down communism in Arabia and ensuring oil supplies.
| a_poke_in_the_mind [Member] 06/13/07 @ 09:35 |
My son has pointed out to me that my reference to women's rights is not particularly applicable. My focus however is on the harm that the far right is beginning to do by insisting on having their sectarian ideas put into our laws. I'm hopeful that our 2008 election will put those right wingers out of power and change our direction. Greg (PS It's nice to see that somebody is reading my blog. I hope you find it a bit interesting and worthwhile. Thank you)
Leave a comment :
Recent Posts
-
The Lobbyist Question
on 2007-08-06 -
Energy -- oil, the sun and the wind
on 2007-06-13 -
Bits & Pieces
on 2007-05-23 -
Homosexuality
on 2007-05-13 -
Are There Any Questions?
on 2007-05-03 -
The Man in the Tower
on 2007-04-27 -
about this blog
on 2007-04-16 -
What Are We Thinking?
on 2007-04-14

05/31/07 @ 14:17